英语论文修改之后，很多客户对英文编辑的批注或修订部分不理解。因此，Enago特别提供免费答疑服务，客户除了可以就英语论文修改内容提问之外，如在英语论文写作方面需要指导，我们的英文编辑也会耐心为您作出解答。
在免费答疑的过程中，您可以：
- 浏览历史问题，在提问之前就可获得丰富的英文编辑知识；
- 与英文编辑互动，进一步了解修改原因；
- 提高英语论文写作水平；
- 什么时候可以向英文编辑提问?
- 收到编辑过的文件之后，任何时候都可以提问。而且此项服务为永久性服务，没有有效期限。
- 是免费服务吗?
- 此项服务完全免费。无论客户提问多少次，提出多少个问题，都一律免费。
- 即使重复的问题，您想要问多少次也都可以，我们每次都会耐心解答直到您满意为止。
- 可以问何种类型的问题？
- 看不懂批注的标签。
- 对英文编辑修改过的部分有疑问。
- 英文编辑在文稿中做出的所有编辑修改。
- 恕不回答需要详细讲解英语语法的问题。
- 谁来回答问题?
- 适合的编辑（在该问题所涉及学科领域的英文编辑；或为您的文稿进行编辑服务的英文编辑本人)。
- 提问的程序?
- 客户在收到修改过的文稿后，提出疑问。
- 在Q&A表格 中填写问题并提交。
- 我们会在查看过问题内容后，通过邮件回复客户返回答案的时间。
- 多长时间能够收到答案?
- 具体时间依问题数量而定。Enago会尽量在两天之内返回答案。
- 如果问题太多，我们可能需要更多时间处理。如果您急着要答案，请在提交问题的时候注明，我们会尽快处理。
- 如果我们同时收到很多客户急着要答案，将会优先处理签订 加急型服务和紧急型服务的客户问题。
范例
下面是一些客户问题及Enago的回复。
客户有疑问，需要澄清
 |
关于语言方面 |
In line 39, you changed to "The number of cell cultures obtained was more than expected…" But I think "The number of cell cultures were more than expected…" is appropriate. Which is better "was" or "were"?
Note that a singular/plural verb is used based on whether the subject is singular or plural. Also, when using "the number of," you should use a singular verb. In the mentioned sentence, the subject is "number," which is singular, and the definite article "the" is used. Therefore, "was" is the appropriate verb in this case.
Please rest assured that the edit is correct, and we hope that the explanation is satisfactory.
 |
关于文风方面 |
In the 4th line of Material & Method section, "Ethanol solution of 6-MP" was suggested to be changed to "6-MP ethanol solution."
Question: I am wondering that sentence should not be started with Arabic numerals.
Thank you clarifying the change.
In this case, the numeral 6 in the term "6-MP" does not signify a quantity or a measurement and is a part of the compound name. Hence, the rule about a sentence starting with a numeral does not apply here. For example, a sentence can start with "5-Carboxymethyl…" but not "5 patients were enrolled." Moreover, since the edited term has been used later in the document, you may retain the edit.
 |
关于细节修改 |
Thank you for your editing. I have questions about third paragraph. Why do you use the word “parameter”?
What differences between the word “parameter” and “categories”?
Thank you for your questions. We have changed “categories” to “parameters” since each of the three phrases, “the era of the works,” “the genre,” and “the narratives”, are characteristics of art. Multiple categories can be created for any one parameter. For example, if you distinguish works of art based on their genre, they can be categorized into renaissance art, abstract art, postmodern art, etc. Thus, the usage of the word “parameters” here is appropriate.
 |
关于标签 |
About Paragraph 2,line1 Tag 2.1
Visual Thinking Strategies is not textbook but art appreciation materials.( for teacher's guide) How can I write it?
Based on your clarification, we feel that “resources” is a better word for “materials.”
However, resources for art appreciation such as Visual Thinking Strategies, a teacher’s guide published by Visual Understanding in Education…
 |
关于备注 |
You said I should mention the limitations of the investigation in the Introduction section
But what exactly are you pointing out? limitation has the meaning of "limit", "realm", etc, but what exactly are you pointing out?
Thank you for your response.
Note that journals usually encourage the mention of limitations of the study in the Introduction and Discussion sections. By "limitations," we mean the "obstacles" or "problems" faced during the course of the study, which may have hindered or affected the results in some way, i.e., factors that may affect the outcomes of the study or are important to interpretation of the study findings. The commonest examples are small sample size, volunteer bias, incomplete follow-up, etc.
Please consider mentioning these in both the above-mentioned sections only if applicable to your present study.
In the Acknowledgements, you refer to this in the more common term “slaughterhouse.” Please check if you can use one term for consistency and reader clarity.
回复: Ok, I will use “abattoir” in the manuscript for consistency.
Thank you for clarifying and acknowledging this.
 |
关于文稿格式 |
Cover Letter: Please submit, as part of the covering letter with the manuscript, the names, full affiliation (department, institution, city and country) and email addresses of up to 5 potential Referees.
编辑回复: I will do that.
Thank you for acknowledging this.
检查要求作者重写的句子:
Thank you for your helpful editing. I made following change after editing: "A discrepancy of 14 mm or <14 mm between MRI and pathological major axis size occurred in 50% (5/10) of cases." Is it OK?
Thank you for your response.
Please make the following minor revisions:
"A discrepancy of 14 mm or <?14 mm between MRI and pathological major axis size occurred was observed in 50% (5/10) of cases."
BEFORE: 6 Fujita interview. Fujita called the book "a best seller among legislators."
AFTER: Fujita called the book "a best seller among legislators" in the interview with the author.
Yes, you may revise the sentence as suggested.
Could you tell me which is better I use "crops" or "cropping"?
In line 27 of final file with insertions and deletions, "gap between crops."
Note that the usage of terms "crops" and "cropping" differs with the context. The term "crop" refers to the yield of a plant in a single growing season and "cropping" is usually used to refer to the period when this yield occurs (cropping of spring wheat or cropping time). Nevertheless, you may revise the sentence to "Early sprouting could therefore allow us to fill the gap between cropping periods" for further clarity.
征求建议:
Dear corrector
Thank you for editing, I have more questions, and e-mailed to you.
I am going to submit journal. The words limit of abstract is 250, but the word count of my abstract is over (273 words). So I removed the sentence reluctantly, "The incidence of obesity at baseline examinations was 3.7% and the incidence of individuals who developed obesity over the 5-year follow-up was 1.6%."
Please comment my decision was appropriate or not.
Thank you for your response. Note that the sentence mentioned by you for deletion represents the key results of the manuscript and would hamper the clarity as well as flow and transition of the abstract since the subsequent sentences are linked to this sentence. Therefore, we are providing a concise version of the abstract, which is well within the prescribed word count of the journal (Present word count ~248 words). Please check. [revised abstract was provided]
Thank you for your response.
Note that in order to achieve the desired character count of 35 characters (including spaces), as specified by the journal guidelines, we suggest you to retain the original running title, i.e., "Heart function affects hip fracture" for accuracy.
